A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for four months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are women between men and women.

1. When the Defendants jointly committed a crime (quasi-Fraud) by the Defendants became close to that of ordinary victims D, and the victims became aware of the lack of judgment and decision-making capacity due to brain-related disorders, etc., they were willing to obtain a loan on the ground that they were joint guarantors.

Accordingly, on August 18, 2016, the Defendants: (a) requested the Defendant A to receive documents necessary for the joint and several sureties from the injured party; and (b) the Defendant A had the injured party issue a resident registration abstract, etc. at the above community service center; (c) made the “loan Contract for the Surety” in the name of D, and sent the FF to the Bank by facsimile by facsimile with documents such as the above abstract of resident registration.

However, in fact, the victim was not able to understand the meaning of joint and several sureties due to lack of judgment and decision-making ability due to the level of 1st, 5.14 years of age, 2 years of age, and 3 months of age of society.

In the end, the Defendants conspired to obtain a loan equivalent to KRW 3 million from the safe loan by using the victim's mental or physical disorder, thereby having a joint guarantor.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. The Defendant, at around August 26, 2016, filed an application for a loan to a person who is not aware of the names of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff in charge of the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan and the Plaintiff’s loan, respectively, in the residential area located in G and 402, G, and 402, as shown in the attached Table No. 2-6, the Defendant sent by facsimile a false loan transaction agreement in the name of D, as described in the attached Table No. 2-6, and a resident registration abstract of D already issued as described in the above paragraph (1). If the Defendant’s telephone is confirmed by the victims, the Defendant’s telephone is the phone.