2. In light of the favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession, and the fact that the instant crime is in the relationship between the final crime and the ex post concurrent crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below, but the Defendant committed the instant crime even under the name of approximately 11,00,000 won, the Defendant did not agree with the victim or have been recovered from the damage even though the amount of deception was not specified as KRW 20,000,000, and other various circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, and family relationship, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.