A. Defendant B and C are 149.37 square meters per floor among the buildings listed in the attached Table 1 list;

B. Defendant D shall be as shown in Appendix 2.

A. On January 27, 2014, the Plaintiff was an association established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) with the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City G G group as a project implementation district, and obtained authorization to establish the association from the head of the Dong-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City, and obtained authorization to implement the project on May 31, 2016, and was determined to obtain authorization to implement the management and disposal plan on December 5, 2017, and was publicly notified on the same day.

B. Defendant B is a person who owns the Plaintiff’s real estate in the instant project zone and is the Plaintiff’s member, and Defendant C, D, E, and F are the tenants of each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff’s members in the instant project zone (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”).

[Ground of Recognition] With respect to Defendant B, C, F, and E: The absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 3, 6, 9, and Gap evidence 4 through 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings as to Defendant D: deemed confession (Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The parties' assertion

A. On December 5, 2017, the Plaintiff received the approval of the management and disposal plan from the head of the Dong-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City and publicly notified the management and disposal plan. Defendant B, C, F, and E are those who commenced business after the date of the public announcement of the instant project, and thus, Defendant B is not eligible for business compensation pursuant to Article 54 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s member, and thus, cannot receive business compensation.

B. Defendant B, C, F, and E asserted that, as they are the Plaintiff’s members, they also have the status of lessee who leases real estate within the instant rearrangement project zone for business purposes, they may receive the transfer cost and order each of the instant real estate.

Defendant C, F, and E shall be their.