Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. While working as a ship engine repair shop in C Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff (BB) had repeated the operation of a shower to string and the adjustment to the bottom of the shower, which is necessary for the assembling of showers, in the engine room in the ship, to string in order to have a static position in the shower, and repeated the operation of the shower to straw up on the floor. On April 14, 2000, the Plaintiff’s first approved disease No. 4-5 (hereinafter “the instant first approved disease”) was the injury and completed medical treatment after receiving medical treatment until October 31, 2002.

B. On October 24, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for an additional injury to the Defendant on the ground of “medical care due to the outbreak or aggravation of the medical care (operation)” (hereinafter “HEM 511”) with the Defendant, but the Defendant filed an application for additional medical care on the ground that the change in overall retired status observed in the summary constitutes a natural change that could not have any connection with the instant work, and that the claim for additional medical care benefits was dismissed on November 13, 2018 (hereinafter “the claim for additional medical care benefits of this case”) and the claim for additional medical care benefits of this case Nos. 4-5 and Nos. 5-Y 1 of the 5-Y 1 of the 2018.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion lies in the Plaintiff’s work, and the deliberation was not conducted on whether the application of this case’s injury or disease was re-medical care for the escape of the conical signboard No. 4-5 of the Pacific Year. The instant disposition that did not approve additional medical care against the Plaintiff was unlawful.

(b).