However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

1. Around 05:00 on June 5, 2014, the Defendant driven a F otobb, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 500 meters from the front day of the convenience store in Speaker B to the front day of the police box located in Speaker D at the same time on the same day, around 05:05 on the same day.

2. On June 5, 2014, from around 04:20 to 05:00 on the same day, the Defendant intending to listen to the warning that he drinks around the C convenience points as indicated in paragraph (1) and slickly slicks, upon receiving the resident’s report, he saw the police officer’s slope G with the police officer’s slope of the police station Escopic called scopic, who was called out after receiving the resident’s notification. However, around 05:05 on the same day, the Defendant driven scopic the scopic and carried out the Escopic box located in D at the Government

Although the Defendant was carrying out a locking box by the schill G’s scam, the Defendant she saw that, around 06:10 on the same day, at around 06:10 on the same day, she saw that, “I would see whether I would have done so or not,” and that, at around 06:20, the Defendant attempted to have a slope belonging to the same police box that discovered the Defendant’s scamba, “I would see if I would have done so,” and attempted to flee out of the police box to check whether I would drive under the influence of alcohol. However, the Defendant she saw that I would have scam “I would scam,” and scam the chest by hand, and assaulted the Defendant with the chest of the police box affiliated with the same police box.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to H and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the state of the operation of a primary driving, and reports on detection of a primary driving;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;