2. The judgment of the court below acknowledged all of the facts charged of this case, there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the sum of damages caused by the crime of this case was not much more than 3 million won, and that 500,000 won was returned to the victim G among the thiefs, etc. However, the defendant who committed the crime of this case at another time without being aware of the punishment for the same thiefs, four times as punishment for the same thiefs, one time as suspended execution, etc., and again committed the crime of this case. The defendant escaped while being tried in the case No. 2014 highest 505 case, which was supported by the Daegu District Court 2014 Highest 505, the defendant committed the larceny crime against G again during the escape period, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's character and conduct, and the environment, are not recognized to be undue due to the defendant's assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.