Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

On April 29, 2014, at around 23:55, the Defendant reported to the police when he was under the influence of alcohol by the winners of E and name in front of the D restaurant located in the Gu-U.S. Si, the Defendant, who was the model father of the Defendant, and the Defendant.

The Defendant, after receiving the report 112, sent a fighting box to the police station of the old U.S. police station, sent a fighting box to the police officer, and sent him to G for arresting the above E as a flagrant offender on the ground that he continued to take a bath for the police officer, and that he did not go against the police officer. The Defendant, with his hand floor, sent him two times and two times and two times and two times in number of heads, and cut off the G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting duties and suppression of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines (the first offender, the details of the crime, the light of reflectability, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;