2. The judgment of the court below is based on the facts that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and divided the errors, most of the damaged goods of the crime of this case fall under a food-type crime, etc. However, considering the fact that the defendant stolens the goods of the self-employed business operator who are relatively difficult to circumstances because of the repetition of the crime, the damage recovery is not achieved with the exception that partial damaged goods have been temporarily returned, and other various sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below cannot be said to be heavy.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.