지부장 당선자 지위 확인 청구의 소
1. The plaintiff confirmed that he was elected in the election for the head of the seventh branch office held by the defendant.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a branch of B Gyeongbuk branch as an incorporated association, and is an organization established with persons engaged in C business in the north-gu in the Pohang-si, and the plaintiff was a member of the defendant and was a candidate for the 7th branch election.
B. On March 15, 2017, the Defendant’s election commission announced that an election for the election of the head of the seventh branch was held at an ordinary general meeting scheduled to be held on March 15, 2017, and the Plaintiff and D completed the registration of candidate.
C. Since then, the Plaintiff filed an objection to the qualification of candidate D with the purport that “The Plaintiff did not conduct C business for more than 180 days after removing D’s office building, and operated a resting restaurant in a new building, and thus is ineligible for election,” and the Defendant requested D to submit business sales data at the Plaintiff’s request.
At a meeting on March 14, 2017, the election commission deliberated on the Plaintiff’s “scambing of letters of election campaign method (induction)” and “scambing of the Plaintiff’s “scambing of candidate” against D’s “scambling of the request for reinforcement of the card sales slip”, and decided on the Plaintiff and D’s “disqualification of candidate”. On March 15, 2017, the Defendant postponed the ordinary general meeting scheduled as of March 15,
E. On March 14, 2017, an election commission sent to the Plaintiff on March 14, 2017, stating that “Notice of Disqualification for the candidate for the chapter head” was “the Plaintiff’s candidate for the chapter head who was registered as a candidate for the chapter head under Articles 12, 21, and 27 of the Election Management Regulations.”
F. After that, the Plaintiff and D filed an objection to the above resolution, and the election commission conducted a deliberation on the above objection at the meeting on March 21, 2017, and decided to dismiss all the Plaintiff and D’s objection. At the time, D submitted a resignation statement prior to the above resolution.
(g) the articles of incorporation, the enforcement rules of the articles of incorporation, and the corporate body B applied mutatis mutandis by the defendant.