2. In full view of the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing on the Defendant appears to have been appropriately determined by fully taking account of all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and the mere fact that the Defendant led to the entire confession of the instant facts charged in the trial is difficult to view it as a special circumstance to the extent that the lower

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition: Provided, That the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; however, “Article 60(1)2, Article 4(1)1, and Article 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.” in Article 60(1)2, Article 4(1)2, Article 4(1)3(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 364(1)1, Article 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 30(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 60 subparag. 2, Article 4(1)3(b) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 60 subparag. 2(1)4(b) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 20 subparag. 4(2)1. 7(b) of the Act.