"2015 Highest 1896"

1. On December 24, 2013, the Defendant was driving a C-wing truck with alcohol content of about 0.074% while under the influence of alcohol level 0.074% on the part of the 5km of the 5km road from the Do in the half-month Corporation located in the Sungdong-gu, Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si on the 15:00 on December 24, 2013 without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by giving the name and resident registration number of the Defendant, who was found to have been drunkly driven by driving at the police station of the Ansan-si in front of the Dongsan-si, Ansan-si, and requested personal information, to the head of the police station affiliated with the police station of the Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and used the name and resident registration number of another person unlawfully.

3. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation was found to have been driven by drinking at the border of the police station of an Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, B prior to the day specified in paragraph 1, and the Defendant suggested that D, when the aforementioned D entered the results of regulating drinking driving into a portable device and requested the signature, signed E on the device, and then failed to know the forgery as if the signature was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

4. The Defendant forged a private document or carried out the aforementioned investigation document at the police box of the police station of the Dongsan-gu Police Station of the Dongsan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (a) stated “E” in the column for confirmation of voluntary accompanying consent while carrying out the personal information of pro-Japanese E as one’s personal information; (b) stated the “E” in the driver’s column of the vehicle’s circumstantial report; (c) signed and sealed the seal on the back to the driver’s column of the vehicle’s report; and (d) delivered the forged voluntary accompanying consent and the driver’s circumstantial report to the police box who did not know of the forgery as if the document was duly formed.

The defendant is entitled to exercise.