However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, who operates a restaurant with her husband, advertised D 25 square meters on the bulletin board of the Eup/Myeon office that he/she would rent D 1st floor in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, a joint owner with her husband.

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant reported the above advertisement at the Defendant’s home located in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, the Defendant reported the above advertisement to the Defendant E, “There is no defect in obtaining the transfer of ordinary people only due to the money that is small in the liquor company, and there is no defect in obtaining the transfer of ordinary people. The perusal of the register of the register of the Republic of Korea is not known. It is believed to be safe and safe. It is believed that he will belong to the friendship with his wife, and whether he will belong to the friendship with his wife.” On the following day, the Defendant made a telephone conversation with the victim, saying, “I will come to the front of the king, but I will lend five million won out of the deposit for the lease.”

However, on March 25, 2012, the Defendant purchased the above land and building (hereinafter “the above real estate”) at a price of 430 million won. On the other hand, the above real estate was subject to provisional seizure up to the sum of the maximum debt amount of the right to lease on a deposit basis and the deposit amount of the right to lease on a deposit basis established prior to October 12, 2012, up to 499 million won. In addition to the sum of the maximum debt amount of the right to lease on a deposit basis and the deposit amount of the right to lease on a deposit basis established prior to October 12, 2012, two provisional seizures were made up of 4,5850,00 won. Around September 10, 2012, the Defendant agreed to lease the above first floor to F with the said lease contract and received five million won in advance from the victim due to the lack of any property from the Defendant.

On October 12, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim as the name of lease or loan in the Defendant’s deposit account at around 19:27.

Accordingly, the defendant is the victim.