A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

Defendant

A above.

1. Defendant A was the representative of Defendant B, a company manufacturing and selling main products located in Kimpo-si, and was engaged in the manufacturing and manufacturing of main products in the company from November 14, 201 to September 21, 201, which are air pollutants from 0.085 pm emission facilities, which are air pollutants from specific air harmful substances (0.08 pm) exceeding the permissible emission levels (0.08 pm). Defendant A, as the representative of Defendant B, a company manufacturing and selling main products located in Kimpo-si, without obtaining permission from the competent authority for one main water disposal facility (14.7 cubic meters in cubic meters), one main water mixture facility (1.3 cubic meters in cubic meters), and using the aforementioned facilities, manufacturing and manufacturing of main products, such as speed reduction machine rinks, brick machinery parts, automobile parts, etc.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed the same offense as that set forth in paragraph 1 in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A certificate of violation (list 3), a certified copy of the corporate registry (list 5), a certificate of sample gathering (list 6), a result of inspection (list 7), and a certificate of report on installation (list 9);

1. Investigation report (List 12);

1. Application of photograph (List 8) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendant A who has a choice of the relevant law and punishment on the facts constituting an offense: Article 89 subparagraph 1 of the atmospheric environment conservation Act and Article 23 (1) of the same Act, and Article 95, Article 89 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, and Article 23 (1) of the same Act;

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The confession, reflection, and Defendant A of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in each criminal procedure law of the order of provisional payment can be deemed to have been committed before around 13 years, but there are no other criminal punishment records. Defendant B seems to have no same control record, and the degree of excess of the permissible emission level is not very large, and Defendant B is maintaining the current emission level by maintaining the facilities immediately after the control and maintaining the facility at the permissible emission level.