However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 21, 2014, at around 18:30 on May 21, 2014, the Defendant driven a b1 ton cargo vehicle with approximately 40km alcohol concentration of approximately 0.203%, while under the influence of alcohol, from around 19:40 on the same day to the roads front of the Gyeongnam Resources located in 147, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeongnam-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the status of drivers, and reports on the status of drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that a person who has been punished several times due to drunk driving and again causes a traffic accident while driving a vehicle in a drinking condition, and the liability for such crime is not somewhat weak.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after committing the crime, etc.