However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 13, 2018, the Defendant requested a police officer E who belongs to the Daejeon East-gu, Daejeon District Police Station C District District, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, to return home from the police officer E who received a report from D (Wing, 38 years of age) to the effect that “any male fright. f. f. f. f. c. f. 85 years of age.”

The Republic of Korea is this kind of Eastern, but n only one food

Shelle flachie

"In doing so, the upper part of the chest of the above E was tightly pushed back once, and the upper part of the E was tried to be tightly cut back to the lower part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of police reporting cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. C District CCTV photographic data and video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and summary order;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime concerned;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant had been punished several times for the same or similar crimes, shall be determined as the sentence, taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant committed the crime of this case again; (b) the damage has not been recovered properly; (c) the confession of the defendant is against the defendant; (d) the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case is not much serious; and (e) the defendant has