A. The Defendant, at the time of the instant case, committed a mistake of fact only a dispute with the victim, because the drinking value was unfairly high at the time of the instant case, and did not interfere with his duties.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misunderstanding the facts to recognize the crime of interference with business.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the lower court’s judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts, the following circumstances can be acknowledged.

1) The victim D, while making an article to B at an investigative agency, had the character of “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am you am, I am, I am...... am........

3) The F, the chief of the singing room for the operation of the victim, is called “Is the defendant's deposit and desire to continue the test, and continue to be able to serve the other customers,” at the court of original instance, and “Is the other customers to get out of their will.”