When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2016. 7. 4. 19:40경부터 같은 날 20:10경까지 구미시 B에 있는 C스포츠센터에 들어가 스포츠 센터 직원들이 평소에 자신의 딸을 신경 쓰지 않고 자신을 무시한다고 생각하여 이에 화가 나서 "딸을 잃어버렸다"고 112 신고를 하고 피해자 D(34세)에게 다짜고짜 "씨발 새끼야! 내 딸 어디있냐! 내가 아빠인데 누가 내 딸을 데리고 갔냐, 너는 뭘 한거냐 씨발 새끼야!" 등의 욕설을 하고, 사무실에 들어가 모니터를 밀쳐 떨어뜨리고 집기를 부수는 등의 위력으로써 피해자의 학원 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. Police investigation report (on the spot situation, etc.)

1. Application of on-site photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes of the 112 Incident List;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Act on Provisional Payment Order shall report falsely to the police to the effect that he ceases to exist, in order to interfere with the victim's business, and the crime of this case is not good. However, after the defendant's request for the formal trial of this case, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim after the request for the formal trial of this case, that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of being punished or a fine exceeding the same crime, the punishment shall be mitigated more than the summary order by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., into consideration.