A shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are those who have come to ever in society and have come to the end.

1. At around 22:45 on October 20, 2018, Defendant A voluntarily operated at the D District District District of the Yasan-si Police Station D, Yasan-si on the ground that he assaulted F, which is the owner of the former E main store, to arrive at the earth, and caused a brucing after having arrived at the earth, Defendant A’s hand on three occasions and caused a brucing by her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the 30,000 won of the market value of the arbitr who is a public object.

2. On October 20, 2018, Defendant A, who drank together with the foregoing D zone, was arrested as a result of damage to the public goods as set forth in the preceding paragraph, Defendant B expressed a bath to the police officers belonging to the above D zone as satise sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate and sate sate sate sate sate sate sate and face sate sate sat

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with respect to the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who selects a fine: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) of the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) is a favorable circumstance that the Defendants’ mistakes and reflects the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant A appears to have recovered from damage in the case of Defendant A, and that the Defendants have no record of the same kind of crime.

However, Defendant A is in need of strict punishment for committing the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, and for assaulting a public official executing his duties and damaging public goods.