However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 22, 2016, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim C (47 years) to put the stone located in the area; (b) but the Defendant refused to put in a dispute; and (c) made the Defendant’s refusal to put in a dispute, she used a insertion (92 cm in length) which is a dangerous object in the area; and (d) made the victim’s shock by assaulting the victim, such as the victim’s water supply, facing with the side of the floor, and caused the victim to go beyond his/her water supply, and caused the victim to go beyond his/her face, thereby doing so for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, inserted photographs, and damaged side photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Quantity (see, e.g., Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1548, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Da1

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the conditions favorable to the above defendant shall be repeatedly considered);