For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that the charge of violating the Juvenile Protection Act constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment based on the record, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby violating the rules of evidence or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Juvenile Protection Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.