However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:10 on March 21, 2014, when the Victim E (the South and the age of 55) (the son and the son) who drinkd together at the D restaurant located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu C was called as “Iskn't have been placed in the uranan department; and (b) when that age, Isn't have been towed to the Daran department; and (c) the Defendant carried a dangerous object on the Darb, which was a dangerous object on the Darb, caused the victim’s head to escape, and led the victim to two parts of the number of days of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Consideration of factors, such as the serious reflectivity, the point agreed with the victim, and the initial charge);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;