When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant would not pay the taxi fee from the taxi engineer within the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station B located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, 2016; (b) the police officer D belonging to the above police box would pay the taxi fee to the Defendant.

“To the end,” the foregoing D is on the law, “I am this part of this pata. B.

In addition, it is only dead.

C. D’s friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to E, F, and A;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Considerations such as the degree of assault on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of assault on the grounds of sentencing, the absence of the same kind of offense, and the reflection of the fact; and