게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unfair sentencing) is that the defendant recognized the error of the defendant, committed the crime of this case without suspicion in a failure in the business and in an economically difficult situation. In light of the fact that the defendant supported his/her mother and wife, his/her children, and his/her health conditions are not good due to Gap's cryption, and the defendant contributed to arresting the distributor of illegal speculative game products, the punishment of the court below that sentenced to two years of imprisonment and confiscation, additional collection of 77,147,40 won is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The crime of this case with regard to the determination of the illegality of sentencing was committed on the ground that the defendant committed the crime of this case: (a) exchanged points obtained by the K game while operating the K game room; (b) caused A to make a false statement to the effect that it is an actual owner of business; (c) it is not good that the crime of this case is committed by providing customers with contents different from those of the game products classified by class while operating the P gameland; (d) the defendant was committed on the ground of the president who was in fact a prior contract for the lease of the K game building in the name of A and had E registered as a business operator of the P gameland; and (e) committed the crime by having A make a false statement as if he was actually a business owner; (e) the period of crime was not shorter than six months; (e) the head of K game machine, installed a P game machine in the P gameland; and (e) the defendant continued to be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 2000 won and a fine of 1000 billion won after the operation of the 2000.7.