2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff is a legal couple who reported marriage with C on April 9, 1986.

B. The plaintiff is residing with his children in Gwangju, and C is living in his house located in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun.

C. The defendant is residing in the same kind as C.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 10 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserts that since around August 2018, the Defendant: (a) from around August 2018, the Defendant sent and sent C and Kakakakao Stockholm; (b) committed unlawful acts, such as dynasing, and dynasing, thereby suffering from mental harm; and (c) the Defendant is obliged to compensate the Plaintiff for the emotional distress suffered by

In full view of the purport of the argument as a whole, the Defendant’s sending and sending C and Kakakao Stockholm messages on several occasions, and the fact that the Defendant sent and sent them over several times, may not be deemed to have reached the degree of fraudulent act solely on the basis of the above recognition.

In addition, only the statements in the evidence Nos. 5 through 7 and 14 are insufficient to deem that the defendant committed an unlawful act with C, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim based on the premise that the defendant committed a fraudulent act with C is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.