beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.08.24 2012고정1578

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 13, 201, Defendant B, in collaboration with E and F, listened to the victim’s desire to “brupted to her,” and met with the victim on the ground that he/she was aboard a road in front of 312-1 of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul, on the ground that he/she was driving on the street, and the victim A (the age of 57) was found to have been dead, and he/she was able to see the victim’s desire to “brupted to her,” and brupted with the victim’s eye by drinking, bruding the victim’s eye, bruding the body of the victim into the floor, e, and F, f, and f, f, headed the victim’s H (the age of 60) with head and f, and f, engaging in an injury to the victim, such as an excellent assault for treatment of the victim for about three weeks.

2. Defendant A, in collaboration with H, took the face of the victim B (the age of 41) at the above time, at the above time, and at the above place, was fright once to drink the face of the victim B (the age of 38), fright to her face of the victim E (the age of 38), Ha was h's h's h's h's h's h', h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h', h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h' and h's h's h's h' h's h's face to the above victim B

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B, E, F, and H;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the Defendants, E, F, and H

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on cover of each injury;

1. Article 2 (2), Article 2 (1) 1, and 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the facts constituting an offense; Articles 257 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant A under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.