beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.01.16 2013고단1178

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the port branch of the Daegu District Court on August 24, 2009, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Ulsan District Court on November 18, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 9, 201, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the port prison on December 10, 201.

1. On April 5, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury by a deadly weapon, etc.) committed an injury to the victim, i.e., the “D key points” located in North Korea-gu, North Korea-gu, Posing on April 5, 2013, where seven beer bottles, which are dangerous objects to the victim E, were collected, and the victim sustained an injury to the victim, such as the entry of alcohol necessary for treatment for about three weeks and the open room of the mouth part.

2. Around 01:50 on September 9, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right at the main point of “G” located in North Korea-gu, North Korea-si, on the ground that the victim H, who is an employee of the guard company, would be able to pay the drinking value. However, the Defendant assaulted three times on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim H, who is an employee of the guard company, would be able to pay the drinking value.

3. At the same time and place as above 2, the Defendant committed an assault to the left hand of the J in order to keep the Defendant from drinking her face while taking a bath to the J, when the slopeJ affiliated with the International Police Station of the Ponding Police Station of the Ponding Police Station of the Ponding Police Station dispatched to the scene.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning K and L;

1. Each police statement made to H and J;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate for an injury), a criminal investigation report (Attachment of a photograph), and a criminal investigation report (Hearing the statement of a shote);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: References to criminal records, etc., investigation reports (Attachment to the judgment, etc. of the same kind of power of the A), and investigation reports A;