1. On August 14, 201, at the Defendant’s residence located in the Dongducheon-si apartment, the Defendant suffered from the injury: (a) the wife E (the wife 58 years of age) brought the Defendant behind the Defendant; (b) the wife did not go out of the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant took her hand with the victim’s left hand; and (d) caused the Defendant to go beyond the victim’s hand and go beyond the victim’s 14 days to undergo treatment.

2. Around January 2014, the Defendant, at the residence of the Defendant located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, caused the complainant to go out of the Defendant, and caused the victim to go out of the Defendant, by hand, with his arms and arms of the complainant, and with his tights, caused the victim to go out of the table.

3. Defluence;

A. The Defendant around September 2014, at the “H” club located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around I and J, etc., who are the complainants of Yongsan-gu, “ females, mentally ill persons, cocoin, and bathize the victim.”

"Publicly insulting the complainant by means of the words "...."

B. The Defendant, around November 2014, is open to the Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “Seowon-dong”). The Defendant, along with K, drinked with the Defendant’s neighbor, and as to the Defendant’s female-friendly Gu, K, etc. as to the complainant, the Defendant is a psychiatrist, kinc, female, and kins

"Publicly insulting the complainant by means of the words "...."

The acquittal portion

1. According to the statement of the injured person's investigative agency, the complainant's statement and the medical certificate of injury in this court, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the complainant as stated in the facts charged.

However, the evidence No. 1, which was submitted by the defendant's evidence No. 1, No. 3 as the result of the examination against the defendant, is written to the effect that the complainant had been present during the interrogation with a written statement of M with the enemy working together with the defendant, and No. 2 is written to the effect that the complainant had been present during the interrogation of the defendant, and No. 3 is proved.