When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be converted into one day.

On May 29, 2015, at the front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, around 01:00, the Defendant took the victim E (32 years of age) who had drinking together with female-friendly job offering D to the alleyway near the above D, and had a dispute over the above D with regard to the relation with the above D, the Defendant was aware of the facts charged in the indictment by hearing the victim’s words “D shall not contact with female-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child.” The Defendant took the Defendant’s appearance of the act in the indictment by having the victim go beyond his mind due to the shock of the victim’s shock, by taking into consideration the victim’s testimony and the Defendant’s legal statement.”

The victim inflicted injury on the victim, 42 days of medical treatment, such as “lurgical depression with one external wound,” and “lurgical depression with one external wound.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements in part of the defendant's legal statement in the eight-time public trial records (a fact that has lost the victim's spirit by hand shall be recognized);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in which testimony is recorded in the eight-time public trial records;

1. Provisions of Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and selection of fines;

1. The Defendant’s determination on the dispute over the Defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in the workhouses. The Defendant merely asserts that the victim’s face was recorded in one by hand, and the victim’s injury was caused in the process of disputing the Defendant under the influence of alcohol.

The following circumstances: (a) the defendant was the person of the defendant during the eight-time public trial with the witness, namely, when the defendant was at the time of the victim's resistance, the defendant returned to the degree of the shock; (b) immediately after that, the defendant was "the victim was at the time of coming to the end of the body and going to the end of the body"; and (c) "the victim was at the time of coming to the end of the body and going to the end of the body"; and (d) the defendant was also at the time of "the defendant was at the time of going to the end of the body of the victim."