, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A as a representative of the operation of the “D”, which is a youth training facility in the Jeonbuk-gun C, a person in charge of the operation and safety management of the said training center, and Defendant B is a person in charge of safety inspection of juveniles who work for the said training center as a “school hall” and participate in the activities for experience of high-quality lectures at that place.

On May 21, 2019, the victim E (the age of 15) was involved in the "F", which is the experience experience, from around 5 meters to the reduction installed in the air from the starting point of about 5 meters to the facilities installed in the public, among the experience programs run by the above training center on May 21, 2019.

A person who operates such highly active facilities has a duty of care to check safety signs and other safety equipment on a regular basis, replace the worn-out equipment, install safety devices, such as safety signs, etc. under the active facilities, provide safety caps, etc. to juveniles using the facilities, and take necessary measures to prevent accidents that may occur during the experience of the facilities, such as providing safety caps and armors, etc., and the teachers who proceeds from experiencing highly active lectures shall faithfully explain cautions for safety, provide safety caps and armors, etc. to juveniles, and provide them with safety labels, and take necessary measures to prevent accidents that may occur during the experience.

Nevertheless, at around 15:00 on May 21, 2019, the Defendants neglected the above duty of care and replace the aged equipment, such as safety level, etc., in advance, install safety nets, etc., provide safety caps or decorations to juveniles, and check up the juveniles in the body.