beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.02.05 2014가단10289

채무부존재확인

Text

1. On March 9, 2014, the Plaintiff took place against the Defendant in the vicinity of the Sodong-dong Sodong-dong Sodong-dong Sodong-gu, Ansan-dong community credit cooperatives.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running the B bus (hereinafter “instant bus”), and the Defendant is a passenger boarding the bus at the bus stops in front of the Korea community credit cooperatives in front of the Korea community credit cooperatives in Manyang-dong, Anyang-dong, Ansan-si, on March 9, 2014, around 10:30.

B. After the Defendant was aboard the bus of this case, the Defendant’s body was followed by the Defendant, and the Defendant was exempted from cutting the columns installed in the bus (hereinafter “accident”), and the process was transferred to the bus, and there was no other passengers’ booms with special attention on the bus of this case, and the bus was operated as they were.

C. After that, on March 10, 2014, the Defendant was diagnosed with six weeks’ injury under the name of “the slick slick slick slick on the left side and the left side slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick on the left side.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Gap 4-1 to 6, the result of the verification of accident video records by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case was very minor and the defendant did not have any injury therefrom, and thus, the plaintiff complained of symptoms without causation and received hospital treatment. Thus, the plaintiff's liability to pay damages to the defendant in relation to the accident in this case does not exist. 2) The defendant asserts that the plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant's damage since he was deprived of the bus floor's water condition while he was on board the bus in this case and suffered the above injury.

B. The burden of proving the existence of causation between the judgment and the damage is, in principle, the victim, and the damage liability due to the tort.