2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On September 29, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) “The Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) served as a volunteer police officer under the control of the Seoyang Police Station C branch; and (b) died in the calendar, which is the fluent force of the local forces following the outbreak of the Korean War, around the beginning of August 1950, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the deceased for distinguished service to the State by asserting that he/she had rendered the application for registration of the deceased.

B. On April 18, 2017, the Defendant determined and notified the Plaintiff that the deceased did not constitute a person of distinguished service to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State and the Act on

(hereinafter) Each of the above decisions is referred to as “a non-conformity of a person of distinguished service to the State of this case” and “a non-conformity of a person of distinguished service to the State of this case”

The Plaintiff appealed and filed the instant lawsuit on July 17, 2017.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 (each number is included in the number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Deceased was employed as a volunteer police officer while residing in the Soyang-gun at the time of the occurrence of the said accident. After the outbreak of the Korean War, the public authority in the area of the Nanyang-gun was imposed, and the Deceased was born in the front of August 1950 by avoiding the shock force organized naturally in the above area, and was concealed in the nearby Eansan-gun. On the ground that the Deceased’s assistance to the police as a volunteer police officer was rendered by the deceased, the deceased was considered as a whole. (2) As such, the deceased’s assistance to the police officer as a volunteer police officer, the determination of the deceased’s non-determination of a person of distinguished service to the State in the instant case should be revoked. If the deceased’s assistance was not a soldier or policeman, the determination of the deceased’s non-determination of a person of distinguished service to the State in the instant case should be revoked as it constitutes a preliminary action for the death of a disaster.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

(c).