2. In full view of the factors that are disadvantageous to the Defendant, such as: (a) the Defendant had a history of being subject to criminal punishment several times due to a misappropriation, theft, etc.; (b) the Defendant was sentenced four times among them; (c) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crime following the completion of the execution of punishment due to the same type of fraud, etc.; and (d) the frequency of the crimes; and (c) favorable sentencing factors that are against the Defendant; and (d) the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines (at least one year of imprisonment), the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(In accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, the defendant shall add "B" in the front of "B" in Part 16 of the judgment of the court below in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the facts constituting the crimes of Parts 2 through 3 are the same as the facts constituting the crimes of Parts 3 through 6, and thus, shall be corrected.