A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the whole pleadings, the following facts are acknowledged:

1) The Defendants were sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for each of the following criminal facts in the Incheon District Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 4014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive by withdrawing an appeal. - Criminal facts - Defendant B is a stock company E (hereinafter “E”) located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon District Court Decision -

Defendant C is a representative director of E, and Defendant C is an internal director of E.

On May 2012, the Defendants prepared a complaint against the Plaintiff by using a warranty protocol at the office E office in the early police officer.

A complaint is filed by the defendant in collusion with F, G, H, I, J, and K, and even though the defendant knew that L, M, and N, a mobile phone seller, was not selling mobile phone around January 2012, the complainant, as if the sales consignment agreement was entered into, had the complainant deliver the mobile phone device and core chip to the above seller, acquired it, and forged the consignment agreement in the name of the above seller and the complainant, and submitted the above consignment agreement to the above seller as if they were genuinely formed, and upon suspicion of the crime committed by the above defendant, submitted the above consignment agreement to the above seller. The six persons stated in the above consignment agreement, including the plaintiff, etc., were ordered by the defendants directly from the defendants, or reported by the defendants, and were not supplied to the defendant or delivered the mobile phone under the defendants's consent. Thus, it was not a false document or a false document to be delivered to the plaintiff, etc., and thus, it was not a delivery or a false document under the defendants' consent.