Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. On June 10, 197, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State on April 12, 2010, asserting that “The Plaintiff was discharged from active service on September 6, 1979, and was subject to Huri Injury in the course of performing the duty of taking measures to prevent the same booming around the end of October 197,” but the Defendant rendered a decision that the Defendant fell under the non-conformity of the requirements for the performance of official duties around October 2010.

B. On August 1, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted an additional statement of fact and military service records, and made an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State. However, the Defendant again made a decision on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with performance of official duties based on the review result of the

C. On August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff additionally submitted a letter of good faith (B, C, etc.), etc., and applied for registration as an applicant. However, on November 28, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff is not a soldier or policeman under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons, etc.”) and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

o-3 to 4 years prior to the discharge, such as records that there was an illness from the fourth floor of the year preceding the five years ago, and records that there was a person suffering from the ground, and the past records are confirmed, and there is no indication of level of level on the outbreak disease, and it is not confirmed that the person was discharged from military service after discharge without an operational treatment, and it is confirmed that the person was discharged from military service after discharge without an operational treatment, and that there was no specific and objective evidence to change the previous deliberation and resolution in addition to the fact written by the applicant, the proximate causal relation with the performance of official duties of the current branch cannot be confirmed.