If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

피고인은 2012. 12. 14. 14:18경 아산시 온천동에 있는 온양온천시장 내 C가게 앞 편도 1차로 도로에서 D 그레이스 승합차를 운전하던 중, 제18대 대통령선거에 출마한 E당 F 후보자의 선거사무원인 G(여, 30세), H(여, 40세), I(여, 43세)가 시장상인들과 시민들에게 인사를 하며 F 후보자에 대한 지지를 호소하는 선거운동을 하고 있는 것을 발견하고, 상향등을 깜빡이고 경적을 울리면서 위 차량을 선거사무원들 방향으로 급가속하여 10m 가량 빠르게 진행하다가 이들 옆에서 급정거하였고 공소사실에는 피고인이 위 차량을 운전하여 선거운동원들에게 “돌진”하였다고 기재되어 있으나 관련 증거들을 종합해 볼 때 당시 피고인의 행위를 그와 같이 보기는 어려웠다. ,

In addition, the above vehicle's chief window was opened and the above election campaign workers were able to take a bath for about 10 seconds, "the speech that does not engage in the F campaign due to weather, and the F marked speech should be seen."

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the election campaign workers in relation to the election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by each police officer in relation to G, H, I, and J;

1. Each description of a criminal investigation report (receiving a copy of the election affairs report) and a criminal investigation report (CCTV);

1. The report on the appointment of the election campaign worker, and the report on the replacement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to image data following a CCTV closure;

1. Article 237 (1) 1 of the Public Official Election Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment prescribed for a crime of violating the Public Official Election Act against I of the largest punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is the purpose of the Public Official Election Act, which intends to protect the freedom of election.