폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles do not go against the victim L, and the Defendant sent the body of drunk L to another place, sent it to the other place, and was on the wall side surface of the wall. Since L did not feel a threat to the wall of the Defendant’s dust, the above brick does not constitute a dangerous object.
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. As to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, first of all, the determination of whether certain goods constitute “hazardous goods” under Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act ought to be based on whether the other party or a third party could feel a danger to life or body when using the goods in light of social norms (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3520, Mar. 26, 2009). In the instant case, the brick of the Defendant’s houseet did not have been made for the original purpose or for destruction, but rather, the brick of this case constitutes “hazardous goods” sufficient for the victim to feel a danger to life or body.
다음으로, 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자 L은 수사기관에서 피고인이 2013. 12. 초순경 인천 서구 M에 위치한 N 식당 앞 노상에서 주먹으로 피해자 L의 얼굴을 수회 때리고 바닥에 있던 벽돌을 피해자 L의 얼굴을 향해 던졌는데 피해자 L이 몸을 피하여 건물 벽에 튕겨 피해자 L의 다리 정강이에 맞았다고 진술하였고, 이 사건 기소 이후 피고인과 합의하면서 원심 법정에서 피고인이 자신의 얼굴 쪽으로 던진 것은 아니고 자신의 조금 옆 바닥 쪽으로 던졌고, 당시 밀폐된...