제3자이의
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On February 18, 2016 and June 29, 2016, based on the original of an executory payment order (No. 2015j3219), the Defendant conducted a compulsory execution of the Defendant’s seizure of eight movables among the movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant beams”) on June 29, 2016.
(No. 2016No. 690, 2016No. 2607). Meanwhile, on July 18, 2016, this Court accepted the Plaintiff’s application in the case of suspending compulsory execution, and rendered a decision ordering the suspension of compulsory execution against the instant boats by the time the instant judgment is rendered.
In the certificate of import declaration of the instant beams issued on December 16, 2013, the taxpayer had been written in C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”), but the written import declaration was corrected, and the taxpayer was corrected.
D and C were sentenced to a fine on October 27, 2016 for the following criminal facts in this Court No. 2016 Highest 1139, which became final and conclusive as they were.
(hereinafter referred to as “relevant criminal judgment”); 1. To export, import, or return goods, Defendant D shall report the name, standard, quantity, and price of the goods in question; type, number and number of packages; destination, place of origin, and place of shipment; in the case of goods subject to origin labeling, whether or not the goods in question are marked; trademark or type; trade name (in the case of an individual, referring to the name of the individual); business registration number; customs clearance code; overseas supplier sign; overseas supplier sign; and the place of storage of the goods in question; and shall not report or make a false report.
C. Nevertheless, on September 2012, the Defendant does not meet the requirements of the importer in order to engage in an imported and selling business with the inside of the “A”, which was well known in the office of the management of the Defendant in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul, to which he had been aware of, and in good faith, in the office of the management of the Defendant.
In the name of State C(State) operated by the Party, the report of importation shall be made to the Party on the face of the State.