2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① E had consistently maintained at the investigative agency and the lower court that the Defendant was at least four times at his hand.

(2) According to the medical certificate of injury, it corresponds to the statement of E that he/she was subject to violence as seen above due to an influence of 2 weeks in the face value of E, an influence, damage to studio, etc., and ③ Defendant himself/herself has also engaged in a conflict with E, and he/she has to face the fluence with E.

“I wish to do so” and “I wish to do so.”

In full view of the facts that “A”, etc. and the face of E were sent four times at his own expense, the Defendant may fully recognize the fact that the Defendant used assault against E’s face, such as the description of the instant facts charged, by hand, in full view of the fact that the Defendant committed assault against E’s face, as indicated in the instant facts charged.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.