채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
around December 2009, the Defendant, who entered the Republic of Korea through international marriage on July 30, 2018, operated the clothes of the “C” in Yasan-si B with the nationality of on July 30, 2018, sold clothes and cosmetics to migrant women, etc., and entered the Republic of Korea on December 26, 2016 as the qualification for students of the E University National (D2), and entered the Republic of Korea on January 9, 2019, and the “F” is a male of Vietnam with the name-free business owner.
1. On March 10, 2017, the Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (hereinafter “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act”) established a claim and obligation amounting to KRW 2.50,000,000, monthly interest and KRW 2.50,000,000,000 for the victim G (the age of 31) and the principal amount (the annual interest rate of KRW 60,000)
In the process of demanding repayment of principal, the Defendant conspired to perform debt collection by threatening the victim through D’s “D” (Suspension of Prosecution) and “F” (Suspension of Prosecution) known to the general public, on the ground that the victim did not repay the principal within the period of promising repayment of principal. A.
Around September 20, 2018, the Defendant and the Defendant, “D,” sent D’s “D” to the H apartment in the front of the Hosisi-si, Hasan-si, North Korea, and demanded the victim to pay debts by getting hot, and “D” to urge the victim to pay debts. On the same day, around 24:00 on the same day, the Defendant and the victim threatened the victim to the effect that “D would not have to pay money if it does not give money by the day.”
Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D’s “D” to collect debt by threatening the debtor.
B. The Defendant and “F” co-principaled by the Defendant and the Defendant, around January 28, 2019, had the Victim “G” pay the principal to “F” and demanded the Defendant to pay the debt. “F” using the I’s mobile phone used by the Defendant to pay the victim a full amount of KRW 1 million.