beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.07.16 2020나56490

임금

Text

All appeals by the defendants are dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the modification of "rescue calculation cost" No. 11 of the judgment of the first instance as "rescue calculation cost", and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable pursuant to Article 24 of the Commercial Act. The Defendants asserted that some of the details of remittances made by the Plaintiff to the Defendants or to the persons designated by the Defendants are without knowledge, and thus, they should not be included in unpaid wages. However, considering the circumstances acknowledged by the overall purport of each entry and pleading as stated in Article 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, and 21 of the Commercial Act, i.e., ① the Plaintiff received money from the Defendants or business partners, and the Plaintiff received money from the Defendants or business partners, and ② the Defendants did not know that they received money from the Defendants, but the Defendants did not know that money was transferred to several persons who wish to receive money from the Defendants, it is difficult to believe the Defendants’ assertion, and rather, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have remitted money to others according to the Defendants’ instructions, and thus, the judgment of the first instance court and the judgment of the court below is dismissed. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.