가. 기초사실 1) C은 2015. 3. 15. 16:30경 남양주시 D 부근에서 자신이 기르던 개를 데리고 산책하던 중 원고를 만나게 되었다. 원고가 개에게 접근하자, 입마개가 채워져 있지 않던 개가 원고(E생으로 당시 만 6세 9개월)에게 달려들었고, C은 개의 목줄을 놓쳐버렸다. 2) 원고는 위 일시, 장소에서 개에게 흉부와 안면부 등을 물렸고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다), 이로 인해 3주의 치료를 요하는 ①다발성 흉벽의 열린 상처, ②외상성 피하기종, 흉벽, ③볼의 열린 상처, ④두피의 열린 상처, ⑤귓바퀴의 열린 상처를 입었으며, 두피, 안면부, 귀, 흉벽의 봉합술과 외이도손상 복원술을 받는 등 18일간 입원치료를 받았다.

In addition, after the accident of this case, the plaintiff received art therapy and maximum face-to-face therapy due to mental shock.

3) Meanwhile, due to the instant accident, C received a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a fine for negligence on December 21, 2015 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Da16394, Dec. 4, 2015). The Defendant is the insurer of C, the insured, the insured, who is the “Undividendsung Fire and Health Insurance New Health Partnership” (hereinafter “instant insurance”). According to the “special agreement on the liability for damages during the family life,” the Defendant is obliged to compensate C for the liability for damages within the limit of KRW 100,000,000,00

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 5 evidence, 14, 15 evidence, 16 evidence, 16 evidence, and Eul 1 (including each number), significant facts in this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, C is negligent in failing to properly attach a line without a safety device such as a dog, etc., even though it has a duty of care to prevent any other person by cutting the dog and cutting it down, etc.