2. In light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for past violent crimes, and even if there were the past records of punishment, repeated crimes of assault and obstruction of business of this case, and the fact that no agreement has been reached with the victim until the court below was held, the Defendant’s liability for the crime of this case is mitigated. However, the Defendant’s confession and reflect on the depth of each of the crimes of this case, and the degree of the assault and obstruction of business of this case is relatively minor, there is no record of punishment heavier than the past fine, and all of the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, behavior, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are deemed unreasonable. Thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.