However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a sexual surgery who works in D's sexual surgery.

On September 15, 2014, the Defendant neglected his duty of care to prevent damage to the boom or damage to the boom in the process of inhaleing the area in order to remove the fright area of the victim F (the age of 37) from the D sexual capital division located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on September 15, 2014, while neglecting his duty of care to prevent damage to the fright and the fright of the fright in the process of treating the fright area, the Defendant caused the victim to the frightening fright which requires treatment for about 51 days by neglecting his negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of G police statement;

1. Notification of the results of appraisal, a written complaint, a written diagnosis (on November 7, 2014), and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution Act / [Scope of the recommended sentence] The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Article 62(2) / [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Article 62(2) of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62] no person in charge of special sentencing] / [Article 4(2) of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62 of the Criminal Procedure] / The defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime of this case, there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, part of the defendant paid to the victim