except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 24, 2019, at around 08:30 on May 24, 2019, the Defendant, while drinking at the Defendant’s house located in B, had the Victim C (54 years of age) who was the husband of the Defendant, and had the Victim C (54 years of age), and had the Victim C, “nicks, kids,” etc., and had the Victim’s hand-to-kicks with his hand-to-kicks, and applied with concrete stones (12cm in length, 11cm in width, and 400g in weight) which are dangerous objects in the chemical part, and had the Victim’s right-to-faced and dried, etc.

As a result, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the so-called Haak, left hand, and left part of the Haak, etc., on which the Defendant could not know the treatment period to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in addition to investigation reports (as to photographing photographs showing the scene of crime), internal investigation reports (as to the field and statement reports, as to the internal investigation reports (as to attachment of field photographs), investigation reports (as to the injury of a victim), investigation reports (as to the addition of photo photographs

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. In particular, the reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) should be taken into account, such as the reflection of the accused, the first offense, the agreement with the victim, and the extent