2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 2, 2014, the Plaintiff, a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Pakic Republic”), entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on a short-term basis, and stayed on May 9, 2014 after obtaining permission for change of sojourn status for general training (D-4), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on November 17, 2014, prior to the expiration date of the period of stay ( November 29, 2014).

B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On April 26, 2009, the Plaintiff’s assertion Pakistan was missing from a national crisis situation due to the bell with the king, such as the occurrence of a large number of refugees due to military operations, carried out by a war against the king in the Sart area.

From October 2012, the Plaintiff was employed in a company engaged in the Maliban crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym crym.

The father of the Plaintiff’s father at around February 2013 (hereinafter “her father”) is likely to conceal his/her father’s “her father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s retirement at his/her closing of work,

‘Before March 2013, ' was subject to intimidation,' and around March 2013, the Plaintiff was threatened by intimidation that the Plaintiff’s remaining birth was not brupted.

After that, the plaintiff was born to Korea due to the bombing of the bomb and the bombing of the bomb, etc., but the plaintiff's family members are still threatened from the bomb.