(2) On the date of the first trial of the court below, the defendant clearly withdraws his assertion of misunderstanding of facts on the date of the trial of the court below). The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and shows his attitude to reflect the crime of this case, that the amount of defraudation is not more than 6 million won in total, and that the equity should be considered with the case where the judgment of the court below is to be rendered simultaneously with the crime for which the judgment

However, considering the following circumstances: (a) it has not yet been agreed with the victim; (b) damage has not yet been recovered; (c) the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime; (d) the court below appears to have determined the punishment in full consideration of the defendant’s various circumstances; and (e) the defendant’s age, character, character, environment, background and method of the crime; (b) circumstances after the crime; and (c) there are no special changes in circumstances that may reduce the punishment of the court below; and (d) the sentencing conditions of this case, including the defendant’

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.