난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on November 7, 2014 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) (short-term visit) of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “the Republic of Pakistan”) as a foreigner of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “the Republic of Pakistan”).
B. On November 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but the Defendant, on February 15, 2017, issued a disposition on recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges having sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.
C. On March 3, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as October 11, 2017.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. On February 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff began to associate with the female-friendly job offers “B” in Pakistan.
However, around July 2014, when the plaintiff's father knew that women's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son'
Accordingly, the plaintiff was shly escaped to Karachi, but became the Republic of Korea.
On September 2016, in order to participate in the marriage ceremony in the private village, the Plaintiff left the Republic of Korea with Pakistan and visited Larkana. The Plaintiff, along with his male and female son, went away from Sarker and went back to Sarker.
The plaintiff is his own country.