However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendant

A is an auditor of G, Defendant B is an out-of-the-counter executive, and Defendant C is an administrative agent, respectively.

1. On March 2016, Defendant A received money and valuables from Defendant A for the purpose of resolving the case in solicitation of a case handled by prosecution investigators who are public officials upon the request of the Busan Local Police Agency to be investigated into undetained with respect to the I, who is the seat of the I, who is the seat of the I and the I, received from Defendant A for a violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (Gambing, etc.).

On March 28, 2016, the Defendant received the above request from I from I in the “Lmaz.” operated by I in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and I called “I will make a solicitation to a public official of the prosecutor’s office through a person who is well aware of within Seosan, so I would make a solicitation to a public official of the prosecutor’s office.” On March 28, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 50 million from I in cash for his school expenses at the near the Busan-dong Busan-dong Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, which was issued from I in the near the Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, the amount of KRW 50 million in cash as school expenses.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. Defendant B received a request from the J to receive a non-detained investigation from Defendant B, and received money and valuables from Defendant A on the pretext of solicitation to the public prosecutor of the prosecution through an administrative agency C, which is a second and second time.

On March 28, 2016, the Defendant received a request from a public prosecutor in charge of the instant case from a prosecutor’s office through an internal high-speed administrative agency C, which would make a solicitation of KRW 30 million from the public prosecutor’s office in charge of the instant case, on the grounds that he/she would make a solicitation from a public prosecutor in charge of the instant case, at a tea shop near Busan East-dong, which was located in the name of Busan-dong, Busan-dong. In addition, on March 28, 2016, the Defendant would offer KRW 30 million out of KRW 50,000,000,000 received from A through N in a coffee shop near the department store.