도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two-month imprisonment, two-year suspended sentence, forty-hours of community service order, forty-hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant is against the Defendant who recognized the facts charged.
However, the blood alcohol concentration of this case is considerably high as 0.189%, and the defendant has already been punished twice due to drunk driving, and the police's order to stop driving is not complied with, and the nature of the crime is very bad.
In addition, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, and circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unreasonable.
3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.