2. The judgment of the court below leads to the Defendant’s confession of the crime, and the offense of this case was committed before the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive. However, the crime of this case is identical with the crime of acquiring stolen property for which the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive, but the frequency of the crime or the number of stolens acquired is much more than the number of stolens in comparison with the crime of acquiring stolen property for which the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive, and thus, it seems that the Defendant could not be exempted from punishment if the two cases are concurrently adjudicated, and the circumstances constituting the conditions for the punishment of this case, such as character and behavior, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, etc. of the Defendant, are taken into account, it cannot be said that the sentence of the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.